Mac66′s Blog :.
LouieMacGoo | March 2, 2010
In the early 1950s, Remington Arms Co. did not have a mid-priced .22-cal. semi-automatic rifle. Management knew that there were three high-cost components of any sporting arm – the barrel, receiver and stock. Engineers analyzed each to see if any significant cost savings could be obtained. They soon concluded that barrels did not offer much opportunity for savings, so they focused on the receivers and stocks.
LouieMacGoo | January 22, 2010
Several years ago Gun Digest ran an article that really detailed the Remington Nylon Rifles. The article included a wonderfully detailed history that covered the conception of the Nylon Rifle by Remington and Du Pont and all details about all the different incarnations.
Mac66 | January 17, 2009
How many times have you asked or read on different forums the above question? The answer of course is quite simple. “It” is worth whatever you, or someone else is willing to pay for it. Of course that answer is rather simplistic as is the question. The real question is: What determines the value? Or, what criteria is the value of my rifle based on? Those questions are not so easily answered.
